Start a new case study to capture project materials and generate a Wix draft.
Loading your case studies…
Loading case study…
Runs the Insight Generator engine to produce a full draft and embeds from this record.
Creates a draft post in the Wix Blog from the generated article and embeds. Nothing goes live — publishing remains a manual step in Wix.
Looks up the local planning authority from the postcode — or, where there is no postcode, from the site address — and finds the application, its reference, planning-page link and any appeal. You confirm the match.
A site returns its whole planning history — pick this scheme's application:
Gathering the decision and design documents and a picture shortlist from the planning register — Planning register: — see the Materials tab for the documents and pictures.
No committee date was returned — this appears to be a delegated decision. You can add one below if it went to committee. The planning-page link is saved to Source Links and will appear in the article's source box when you generate.
Fetching from the council register (directly, or through the UK relay for registers that only answer UK connections)…
Everything the register offers is on the record as Source Documents — the writer can quote the officer report and decision notice.
The Panel's reports on the register are the applicant's public copies; tick "Panel Reports Public" on the sessions panel if the article may quote them.
Finds this scheme in the Bookings base: how many times the Panel reviewed it, in what format, and the Panel's written feedback for each session, which the article uses to describe progress between reviews. A certain match fills Linked Booking and Session dates where they are empty; otherwise you pick the scheme.
Bookings record(s): — filled .
Also under Session dates but not in the Bookings base (still counted in the article; worth checking in Bookings): .
Issued reports are read from the Dropbox archive once its read-only key is set up. Until then, any feedback held on the Airtable session is used and the article treats it as a draft.
These Bookings records may be this scheme. Pick the right one:
Drop images here
JPEG, PNG or WebP · up to 5 MB each. The first image becomes the hero.
The decision and design documents for the confirmed application, filed in this project's Dropbox folder and added to Source documents, and a shortlist of up to ten pictures from the Design and Access Statement, landscape documents and proposed drawings. Under the Panel's booking terms the design team permits their use, so a picture arrives cleared when its credit is known; one without a credit is held until you add it. Decline any picture you do not want used. Maps, aerial photographs, other buildings and stock images are left out, as the booking terms cannot cover them.
This usually takes a few minutes.
The last run stopped without finishing: there has been no word from the engine for over 20 minutes (it may have restarted). Press “Gather again” to retry.
— (through the UK relay); the register's terms page was accepted. .
Left out: .
Pictures not shortlisted: .
No images yet. Files the architect uploads through the Dropbox request are pulled in automatically when this record opens — or press “Check Dropbox for new uploads”. No images yet. Drop in the hero image and any inline images you want to feature.
DRP feedback, design team presentations, officer reports, decision letters — anything Claude should read alongside the brief. Paste a Dropbox / Google Drive link for now. Direct file upload comes online once Dropbox is configured.
No supporting documents yet.
Claude will propose three editorial angles once the brief and key project facts are filled in. They'll appear here on the Review step.
When the checklist below is complete, this case study can be sent to Claude for a clarifying-questions review and then on to draft generation.
Submitted by , · . The details are unverified — check the planning facts, any quote and consent, and pull the images in from the links below before ticking Cleared to Publish.
The architect has returned the detail form on . The design team, narrative, specifications and captions are on the fields above. Sent — waiting on the architect. Issuing a fresh link is safe: the old one keeps working until it expires, and both write to this same record. Once the Panel takes this project forward, issue an invitation link and email it to the architect. It opens a form pre-filled from this record that collects the design team, the narrative, the specifications and the image captions.
Generation runs on demand: tick Cleared to Publish above, then press Generate the article. The draft appears on this tab, usually within 5 to 15 minutes, with an approve-and-publish step to land the Wix draft.
A draft is being written now.
The article and its embeds are being generated. The status updates automatically when it completes.
Review the draft below, then use Approve & publish to Wix draft in the generation panel to land it in the Wix Blog. Go-live stays a manual click in Wix.
Check the Activity tab for the failure detail. You can retry by resetting the status to Ready below.
You have an in-progress conversation with Claude. Opening the panel resumes from where you left off.
Search the internet for this scheme's planning-committee recording. The search uses the record's LPA — add the LPA on the Project tab first and committee date, and brings back candidates for you to choose from. Nothing is embedded without your approval.
Or paste a recording link yourself (YouTube links can be embedded; use the timestamp box for the agenda item start):
Either searching YouTube for 's planning committee, or reading the selected recording's transcript to locate this scheme's agenda item. Usually under a couple of minutes (plus a minute if the engine is waking).
Open each link to check it's the right committee. Selecting a video never publishes anything — you review and approve everything afterwards.
Leave the boxes empty to use the located times; fill them to override.
"Create branded clip" trims the recording to this scheme's agenda item, adds the Panel title slate and uploads to @designreviewpanel as Unlisted with the thumbnail set — you approve before anything goes public. "Embed as-is" places the council's full video in the article, starting at the start time.
The clip is on YouTube as Unlisted. Approving flips it to Public on the @designreviewpanel channel and embeds it in the Wix draft. Rejecting leaves it Unlisted; the article ships without the video.
This is the council's own recording (starting at ). Approving embeds it in the Wix draft — nothing is changed on YouTube. Rejecting means the article ships without the video.
Open in YouTube Studio if you want to edit the title, description or thumbnail before approving.
The embed is being placed in the Wix draft now (a minute or two if the engine is waking). If this record hasn't been published to Wix yet, the video is included automatically when you approve & publish.
The video is in the Wix draft. Open the draft from the Project tab, position it where you want, and publish from Wix when you're happy.
Open on YouTubeEvery status change, Cowork run and Claude review for this case study.
Loading…
No activity yet. Entries appear here as the case study moves through the pipeline.
Give it a name to get started. You can fill in everything else on the next screen.